Like much of the world I woke up this morning to the shocking news
that Donald Trump is now America’s President-Elect. There has been a great deal of chatter,
post-election wisdom and hand wringing angst so I will attempt not to go on
about what this win means in political terms.
Instead I would like to think about the power of media.
In 2008 I watched with intense interest the Democrat primaries as
Hillary Clinton duked it out with Barack Obama.
I was always stunned by the after debate analyses when moderators
declared Obama had out talked Clinton. I’d
ask “What did you hear that I didn’t?
She gave indepth answers while he talked nothings”.
In 1990 the Ontario NDP’s won a majority government which took
corporate Canada by surprise. In the
years that followed I have heard this comment many times “look what the NDP did
in Ontario” and I’d ask “what was that?” and responses floundered or were
tentative such as “they sank the economy”.
I’d go “really, the NDP had the power to sink an economy that was
already in a recession, how did that work?” and of course there’s dead silence
after that. But the people who are
anti-NDP (or against any type of social programs – except, naturally they need
help) blindly listen to what they have been “told”.
Where do people get their “facts”?
Since the invention of newspapers, then radio and then television some
people get some sort of information from these sources. These people will then pass on a somewhat
garbled account of what they have read or heard (although I believe that they
honestly think they are being accurate in their interpretations).
In the early 1980’s I worked for a lawyer who was extremely
political and it was through him that I first learned the term “yellow
journalism”. This is a type of journalism that uses little or no legitimate
research in its story. Instead these yellow
newspapers use exaggeration, sensationalism and scandal-mongering to create eye
catching headlines in order to sell more newspapers. This type of “journalism” has spread into
radio and television to the extent that many journalists become celebrities
with their own brand or style of “reporting”.
People become more and more confused about what they are actually
hearing or learning about any given topic.
Movie stars and other celebrities weigh in on topics that they often
have little or no real information about (witness Leonard DiCaprio believing a
chinook was a sign of global warming) and yet their comments will influence
their followers, some profoundly.
Now I have looked at a question that arose in a writing contest
feature and pondered answers. The
question was, “Are digital technologies making politics impossible?”
For today, I will leave you with that to ponder as you absorb the
news of Donald Trump’s win over a woman who, in my opinion, has brought more
experience, intelligence, human compassion and a lifetime of public service into
this race than any other presidential candidate in modern history.
I agree with you 100 per cent. I never thought I would live to hear myself say dum AMERICANS. But after yesterday there sure were plenty of them.
ReplyDelete