
I think in terms of safety and livelihood that the farmers’
concerns should be addressed first. The
devastation of the livestock appeared quite significant so pending more information
my thought would be that perhaps the environmentalists and government need to
look at how they can best assist in saving the wolf without cost to the
farmers.
As human beings, however disappointing we may be, our “needs”
should trump anything else (within reason) including the environment. I know this opinion upsets environmentalists
a great deal but as human beings who else really can do anything? Again, I am talking about simple economics,
jobs and livelihoods; I am not advocating the desecration that big business has
done in the past without checks and balances.
That needs to continue, but again, within bounds, within reason and not
at cost of essential jobs.

Here we go – should the B.C. and USA pipelines go
ahead? In my opinion, if the original assessments
were legitimate and the provisos are kept, then yes. I think that the pipelines are much safer
than railways to get the oil to markets.
I also think that Canadians should use some common sense in their
debates over this question. Which
currently I do not think is happening. I
think most people who enter the debate have not done their research but are
just on bandwagons because they think its “politically correct”.
But this is just one person’s opinion – I get to say what I
like on my blog. And as Sarah Haynes
said today on The View – responses should extend the courtesy of appreciating “nuances”
in opinions. Remember I have a
sustainable farm, I have long done recycling, not using Styrofoam cups, driving
a green car and myriad other environmental forms of helping our planet.
No comments:
Post a Comment