There was an
interesting article in this evening’s paper discussing the Canadian Medical
Association Journal’s push to have spanking outlawed. Section 43 of the Criminal Code was upheld by
the Supreme Court in 2004 ruling that the provision did not infringe on a
child’s right to security under the Charter of Rights & Freedoms. But the CMA feels that it is archaic and
inhumane to spank a child.
I can see it all now, a five year old
termagant secures a lawyer and sues his mother for spanking him after he
screamed the house down because he didn’t want to eat his turnips or go to bed
at bedtime. Yes, yes, let’s just talk
some sense into the child, give him a timeout somewhere (but not too isolated
because that could also be considered cruel and unusual punishment – though in
a practical sense I’d be wanting to keep my eye on the termagant in case he
decided to scrawl on the walls with his . . . you know).
I am certainly not opposed to teaching parents
how to handle children, and I understand why Dr. Phil wouldn’t publicly
advocate spanking but even Dr. Spock lived to publicly regret saying spanking
didn’t have a part to play in parenting (look it up, it’s true).


In a perfect world there would be no
physical punishment. In a perfect world
there wouldn’t be lunatic speedsters on the highway either.
I’m just saying.
No comments:
Post a Comment