Earlier this
year there was a story about a teacher in Edmonton who was suspended due to
giving a student a zero on a paper even though the school board had made a
policy of No Zeros to be issued. Recently
it was announced that the teacher was subsequently fired from his
position. When I listened to the news
story the information was that the student in question had not turned in a
paper of any kind. How does one assign a
mark to a non-existent paper with non-existent effort? I’d just like to understand that
rational. To the best of my knowledge we
are talking about an assignment, not the whole term.
This afternoon as the train was pulling
away from the final downtown station we in the train could hear a foul mouthed
girl albeit well dressed shouting into her cellphone with words to this effect:
“You are my F*&^ing teacher, you
F&^*er and I want my F*&^ing assignment . . .”
People were gasping on the train or saying
“did you hear that?” or looking at each other with mouths open. I was thinking “the fine result of no-zero
policy, just curse at your university professor and expect that he will give
you an Aplus because never before have you reaped consequences.” That’s pretty much what I was thinking.

Really, for all the people out there who
have always crossed on green lights only, never jay walked, always written
cheques only to the amount of the dollars in your account I ask “where did we
go wrong?”
No comments:
Post a Comment