I will freely confess that I am a Barbie fan; I stayed in the closet
for a long time but I played Barbies well into my teens and even after that I
still made all kinds of Barbie clothes, mostly “olden day” gowns and hats. I even made bloomers and lavish
petticoats. I made doll houses for Barbie
and created all kinds of stories for her while playing with my little
sister. We made one doll house at the
bottom of Mom’s linen closet and amazingly my mother let us keep it there for
weeks on end.
This week Mattel revealed a new series of Barbies that included
petite, tall and ‘curvy’ as well as various skin tones and ethnic looks. There is a lot of discussion around this new
creation but some of it seems a bit of bosh to me. First of all the skin tones and ethnic looks
are not new, they have been around for quite a while and does anyone remember
Barbie’s original best friend Midge who had a very different face, a pug nose
and freckles?
The real talk is about Barbie’s unrealistic figure which of course
has been talked about a great deal of the years but from the first time I saw
Barbie I fell in love. I liked a “grown
up” doll much better than the baby dolls which I abandoned immediately when I
got my first Barbie (which was actually the doll Mitzi – Barbie’s original
rival). I loved to be able to dress her
in different fashions and back in the early 60’s Mattel brought out really
great quality costumes complete with hat, gloves and shoes to coordinate with
the outfit. In those days the outfits
were beautifully tailored unlike the cheap clothes that is put out today.
The discussion I heard on the news this week claimed that Barbie was
basically a fashion doll and not in keeping with real life. I thought “what kind of talk is that”? Of course, girls love to dress up the doll in
different costumes but if a girl has any imagination she is going to make a
story out of the costume. Today Barbie
is wearing her stewardess outfit and she is flying off to Hawaii. Once there she will meet Ken and they will
have a holiday on the beach where, of course, they will find a body of GI
Joe. Barbie luckily has brought her
camera and immediately takes pictures of the crime scene. As luck would have it, she brought along her
notebook, etc.
Any girl with the real stuff knows how to play up with Barbie or any
other toy. Her imagination is only
limited by whatever is put in her brain by negative talk and curbing adult
ideas.
The difference with the
1960’s and 2016 has a lot to do with the programming on television. Today children appear to be taught by the
example of what is thrown at them on television; vampires, crime and sex seem
to be the fodder on television and even in young adult books. In the 60’s we watched westerns, detective
shows and family shows. Even by the mid
60’s there were female detectives like Honey West, Emma Peel and April Dancer
(the girl from UNCLE). Enlightened
parents taught their daughters that they could go to university and aspire to
any professional open to men. Today,
what is being taught? I’d like to know
where the problem lies. But don’t blame
Barbie, please.
No comments:
Post a Comment